<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Coal Gasification News &#187; false statements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coalgasificationnews.com/tag/false-statements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coalgasificationnews.com</link>
	<description>Coal gasification news and information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>False Statements About Clean Coal</title>
		<link>http://coalgasificationnews.com/2009/11/30/false-statements-about-clean-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://coalgasificationnews.com/2009/11/30/false-statements-about-clean-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false statements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalgasificationnews.com/?p=1234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When opponents of coal and petcoke gasification write a list of the reasons that a coal/petcoke gasification project should be stopped, there are two false statements that are commonly cited.  The first is that its experimental and the second is that its more expensive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://coalgasificationnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/clean_coal.jpg"><img src="http://coalgasificationnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/clean_coal.jpg" alt="" title="Clean Coal" width="425" height="282" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1236" /></a></p>
<p>When opponents of coal and petcoke gasification write a list of the reasons that a coal/petcoke gasification project should be stopped, there are two false statements that are commonly cited.<br />
<br />
One of the most common false statements is that the technology is experimental.  The technology is actually very old and tested.  <a href="http://www.anl.gov/PCS/acsfuel/preprint%20archive/Files/31_2_NEW%20YORK_04-86_0270.pdf">Dow Chemical announced that the technology was commercial in 1979</a>.  That&#8217;s 20 years ago.  Sasol has been operating coal gasification plants for many decades.  The <a href="http://coalgasificationnews.com/success-projects/great-plains-synfuels-is-the-first-us-commercial-scale-gasification-plant/">Great Plains Synfuels Plant in Beulah, ND</a> has been in operation since 1984.<br />
<br />
The second most common false statement is that the technology is more expensive than other sources.  When the facility in question will not be completed and started up for 4 to 5 years, it&#8217;s difficult to impossible for someone that doesn&#8217;t have access to the economic       to make that determination.  It&#8217;s more logical to believe that the developer that has worked on the project for a year or longer is better equipped to make the decision.  The logical conclusion is that the statement is false.  When carbon capture and sequestration is included with the project scope of work, the cost is almost always less expensive than alternative technologies.<br />
<br />
Both of these arguments highlight weak defenses by the opponents of coal/petcoke gasification projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalgasificationnews.com/2009/11/30/false-statements-about-clean-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
